LIBERTATEA DE CONȘTIINȚĂ CA FUNDAMENT AL PĂCII ÎN LUME. EDIFICAREA UNEI COEXISTENȚE RESPONSABILE ÎNTRE CONVINGERI ÎN ORIZONTUL UMANITĂȚII COMUNE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19478545Keywords:
freedom of conscience, peacebuilding, ethical pluralism, conflict prevention, human dignity, coexistence, intercultural dialogueAbstract
Freedom of conscience as the foundation of world peace. Building a responsible coexistence between beliefs in the horizon of common humanity.
In a world marked by persistent conflict, ideological polarization, and identity crises, the question of the foundations of peace within the moral order of humanity becomes more pressing than ever. Traditionally, the concepts of peace and security have been associated with the absence of physical violence or with geopolitical balance; however, contemporary approaches shift the emphasis toward deeper structural and cultural dimensions of peaceful coexistence. Within this framework, freedom of conscience, understood as the right of every person to think, empathize, and act according to their own moral and religious convictions, emerges ever more clearly as an essential pillar of authentic peace.
Freedom of conscience is not merely an abstract individual right; it is a concrete indicator of the maturity of a democratic society. It lies at the core of all other liberties, freedom of expression, religion, and political belief, and reflects a community’s ability to manage pluralism without resorting to exclusion, coercion, or stigmatization. In the absence of this freedom, minority convictions become sources of tension, and ideological intolerance may escalate into radicalism, structural violence, or even civic collapse. As Hans Küng aptly observed, “There can be no peace among nations without peace among religions, and no peace among religions without dialogue between religions”, a statement whose meaning can be extended in a broader sense: without dialogue between consciences, no responsible peaceful coexistence is possible. The aim of this paper is to articulate the relationship between freedom of conscience and the construction of an equitable and peaceful order, from both normative and practical perspectives. It will begin with the philosophical and legal foundations of freedom of conscience, in order to explore how this right contributes to conflict prevention and social cohesion. It will be argued that only peace founded upon respect for the conscience of others can be truly viable over time, within the context of an interdependent, fragile, and diverse humanity.
References
• BIELEFELDT, Heiner, Freedom of Religion or Belief: Thematic Reports of the UN Special Rapporteur 2010–2016, Routledge, 2017;
• BREMS, Eva (ed.), Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights, Intersentia, 2008;
• DURHAM, W. Cole, & SCHARFFS, Brett, Law and Religion: National, International, and Comparative Perspectives, Aspen Publishers, 2019;
• EVANS, Carolyn, Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001;
• FERRARI, Silvio, Law and Religion, Oxford University Press, 2017;
• GALTUNG, Johan, Violence, Peace, and Peace Research, Journal of Peace Research, Sage Publication Ltd., Oslo, vol. 6, nr. 3, 1969;
• GALTUNG, Johan, Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization, Sage Publications, 1996;
• GALTUNG, Johan, „Violence, Peace, and Peace Research”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, No. 3 (1969);
• HUNTER, James Davison, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, Basic Books, 1991;
• KANT, Immanuel, Metafizica moravurilor, traducere de Nicolae Bagdasar, București: Editura Științifică, 1992;
• KANT, Immanuel, Critica rațiunii practice, trad. rom., Humanitas, 2008;
• KEOWN, Damien, Buddhism and Bioethics, Palgrave Macmillan, 2001;
• KUNG, Hans, Toward a Global Ethic: An Initial Declaration, Parliament of the World’s Religions, 1993;
• LEDERACH, John Paul, The Moral Imagination: The Art and Soul of Building Peace, Oxford University Press, New York, 2005;
• MACINTYRE, Alasdair, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, 2007, pp. 1–20; Charles Taylor, A Secular Age, Belknap Press, 2007;
• NUSSBAUM, Martha, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2000;
• NUSSBAUM, Martha Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America’s Tradition of Religious Equality, Basic Books, 2008;
• RICOUER, Paul, Soi-même comme un autre, Seuil, 1990 ;
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “A look at how the concept of human rights has evolved over time”, Journal for Freedom of Conscience (Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință), Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023), pp.825-874;
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Current Values of Education and Culture”, In Proceedings of the 23th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, edited by Nicoleta Elena Heghes, 87-92, Princeton, NJ, United States of America, 2021. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5507021;
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Moral Values and Human Values: Support for Sustainable Societal Development”, In Chivu, L., Ioan-Franc, V., Georgescu, G., De Los Ríos Carmenado, I., Andrei, J.V. (eds.), Europe in the New World Economy: Opportunities and Challenges. ESPERA 2023. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham. 2024, pp. 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71329-3_17 ;
• SAJO, András & UITZ, Renáta, The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism, Oxford University Press, 2017;
• SAJO, András, Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012;
• SEN, Amartya, Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, W.W. Norton, 2006;
• SHAKMAN HURD, Elizabeth, Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion, Princeton University Press, 2015.
Documente internaționale
• Amnesty International, Iran: Human Rights Violations Against Bahá’ís, Report 2022; Human Rights Watch, Break Their Lineage, Break Their Roots (2021) – despre represiunile din Xinjiang;
• AP News, Iran Strikes Back After Israeli Bombings, iunie 2025; Al Jazeera, Timeline: 12 Days of Israel-Iran Escalation, 2025;
• Human Rights Watch, Pakistan: Persistent Persecution of Shia Muslims, 2025;
• Pew Research Center, Global Restrictions on Religion, 2023; United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), Annual Report 2024, Washington, D.C.;
• Religion Unplugged, The Ongoing Violence Against Ahmadis in Pakistan, 2025;
• Vatican, Declaration on Euthanasia („Iura et Bona”), Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 1980; v. și Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, The Dignity of Difference, Continuum, 2002;
• O.N.U., International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adoptat prin Rezoluția 2200A (XXI), 16 decembrie 1966, art. 18;
• O.N.U., Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, 25 noiembrie 1981, A/RES/36/55.
• UNESCO, Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace, 1999, art. 1;
• UNESCO, Declarația privind o cultură a păcii, 1999, art. 1–5;
• Conv.E.D.O. – art. 2, Dreptul la viață, - art. 9, Libertatea de conștiință, de gândire și de religie.
Jurisprudență CEDO
• CEDO Bayatyan v. Armenia, hotărârea din 7 iulie 2011;
• CEDO, Folgerø and Others v. Norway, hotărârea din 29 iunie 2007;
• CEDO, Kokkinakis c. Grecia, hotărârea din 25 mai 1993, §31;
• CEDO, Pretty v. United Kingdom, hotărârea din 29 aprilie 2002;
• CEDO, R.R. v. Poland, hotărârea din 26 mai 2011;
